Friday’s performance was billed as “pure, traditional blues.”  I pictured something raw and unplugged. A lone guitar bending notes that pull at your emotions. Your feet tapping instinctively. You locked into the swaying rhythm.

If you know traditional blues, you know it’s slow and deliberate, the silence between the notes lingering in the air. I knew what to expect.

What I didn’t expect was a high-octane midnight drive through a neon-lit city. It was an explosive, electrifying collision!

Now, don’t get me wrong. I have nothing against electric blues-rock fusion with all its ferocious energy.  And the bands were brilliant! But it wasn’t what it said on the tin.

I just couldn’t settle into a single song. Because the evening that I’d booked was billed as “pure, traditional blues.” What I heard was something else entirely. So instead of losing myself in the music, I spent the whole night waiting for a sound that was never going to come.

That’s the clarity principle in a nutshell. People don’t just judge what you deliver. They judge it against what you told them to expect. A great performance against the wrong promise feels like a disappointment because the gap between the message and the reality never closes.

Leaders do this all the time. We announce a “quick sync” that turns into a strategy overhaul. We call something “final” when it’s really a draft. We promise “transparency” and deliver information on a need-to-know basis.

The content of your message might be excellent. But if it doesn’t match what people were told to expect, a communication gap opens and your message fails to land.

The practice of Clarity asks that the sign at the door matches the show inside. This is the third of the 5 principles of The HACKS Code.  

Click here to be notified when my book, The HACKS Code is published.